Five dashboards. No shared row.
RankSage started from a frustration every growth and SEO team knows: the data exists, and none of it agrees on the page.
Traffic lives in GA4. Positions live in Search Console. Behaviour lives in a session tool. Audits live in a crawler. AI visibility, if you measure it at all, lives somewhere else again. Five tabs, five vocabularies, and still no answer to why last Tuesday went sideways.
None of those tools are bad. The problem is that none of them share a row. Traffic is grouped by channel, rankings by query, behaviour by session, audits by issue type. The insight that matters — this page ranks well, reads thin, frustrates the people who arrive, and never gets cited — requires all four to be true of the same URL at the same time, and nothing puts them there.
So we built the joining layer. RankSage crawls your pages and your competitors’, runs the questions your buyers ask against ten answer engines — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok and five more — plus Google AI Overviews, reads your Google data over read-only access, and optionally records visitor behaviour from your own domain. Everything lands on the page it belongs to, and comes out as one ranked list of what to change next.
The AI shift made this urgent rather than optional. When an answer engine resolves a question without sending the click, the useful questions change shape: which of my pages are exposed, who is being cited instead of me, and what structurally has to change for the answer to be built from my page. Those cannot be answered by a citation counter alone — they need the citation data joined to the rankings and the content.
We are deliberate about the parts nobody advertises. A crawler that claims to be ClaudeBot is checked before it counts. An engine that was unreachable during a run is named, not averaged away. A check that could not complete reads as “we could not check this” rather than as a pass. It is slower to build that way and it is the only version worth putting a decision on.
One clarification, since the names get confused: RankSage is an independent, self-serve software product — not a marketing or SEO agency, and not affiliated with any other business with a similar name. There are no retainers or service packages here, just software with monthly plans, published openly on our pricing page.
The team
We are a small team, independently funded, with no logo wall to show you yet. That is the honest state of things in early access: the product is real, built against live Google Analytics and Search Console data on real sites, and it is the whole pitch. If it does not tell you something you did not already know, nothing else we could put on this page would matter.
Five things we will not compromise on.
- 01
A number you cannot check is a rumour.
Answer-engine tools are easy to build and hard to trust. Every score in RankSage is derived from stored evidence you can open, and a check that could not run says so rather than returning a comfortable zero.
- 02
AI search adds a dimension to SEO. It does not replace it.
You still need the position. You now also need to be the source the answer is built from, and those two are not won the same way — which is exactly why they need to be read side by side.
- 03
The insight lives at the intersection.
A page with strong rankings, thin content, a frustrated audience and no citations needs all four signals to diagnose. Any one of them alone points somewhere plausible and wrong.
- 04
A brief should start with evidence, not keyword volume.
What visitors struggled with on the pages you already have is a better input to the next piece than a search volume estimate, and it is sitting in your own data.
- 05
Sampling breaks the things worth finding.
Rare events are where the failures are. We process every event we receive rather than estimating from a slice of them.
Check it against your own data.
Connect Google Analytics and Search Console read-only, and see whether the row tells you something your dashboards did not.
No payment details. One email when access opens.